Geoff Jennings - Clean Energy & Clean Transportation Consultant http://g.eoffj.com/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Sweetcron g@eoffj.com Google Maps Now has Biking http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/297 Google Maps, my go to website for directions and maps, has now added “biking” for directions. Prior to this update you could only select car, public transit and walking for mode of travel.  Google would then calculate the best route, distance and time dependent on your mode of transportation.

Quickly looking at my home town of Charlotte, NC, this morning, you can see a few different colored lines.  The dark lines seem to be the bike paths or greenways in the area and the dotted lines are what I think to be bike friendly roads. Anyone who has ever tried to bike across San Francisco knows the value of a good bike map in helping to avoid 200-foot hills and city streets that behave more like freeways. Google Maps users have created their own bike maps for cities like New York and Minneapolis, but Google itself hadn’t taken that step until now. Google obtained much of its data from the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy in putting together the maps, and will have detailed information on bike routes in 150 U.S. cities as of Tuesday night’s launch, said Shannon Guymon, Google Maps product manager. Bikers will be able to find bike-only paths, bike lanes on city streets, and bike-friendly streets when searching for directions using the tool. Google will also include an estimated travel time alongside the results that factor in hills and fatigue. Source : CNet.com Learn more at http://maps.google.com/biking and Google Maps “Bike There.”

]]>
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:33:00 -0500 http://commutebybike.com/2010/03/10/google-maps-now-has-biking/
Anyone know who this is? http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/296 Anyone know who this is? "> Would you mind asking your club members if anyone knows the kayaker in the attached photo? I'd like to forward a full-sized version of this shot to him. Feel free to post on your site, if you think it will help.> Picture taken at Surfer's Point on Sunday, February 28,2010, about 1:00.> Thanks and regards,> Tim Hanson

]]>
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:35:00 -0500 http://go.kayaking.com/xn/detail/2178934:BlogPost:27588
12 Undocumented Tricks for Google Buzz http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/286 After spending a few hours on Google Buzz, we're proud to present you with 12 simple tricks to help give you a better Buzz. Before you start drinking the Google juice, though, make sure you choose a designated driver!

]]>
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:21:00 -0500 http://aext.net/2010/02/12-undocumented-tricks-for-google-buzz/
Giz Explains: Why ISO Is the New Megapixel [Giz Explains] http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/287 In 1975, the first digital camera took 23 seconds to record a 100-line black-and-white photo onto cassette tape. Today, a Nikon D3s takes photos with 12 million pixels at 1/8000 of a second. And it can see in the dark. The conventional wisdom is that the romp-stomp-stomp of progress in digital imaging has proceeded on the mostly one-way track of ballooning pixel counts. Which wasn't always a pointless enterprise. I mean, 1.3-megapixel images, like you could take in 1991, aren't very big. The Nikon D1, introduced in 1999, was the digital camera that "replaced film at forward-looking newspapers." It was $5,000 and shot 2.7 megapixel images using a CCD sensor, large enough for many print applications. But still, there was room to grow, and so it did. Now pretty much every (non-phone) camera shoots at least 10-megapixel pictures, with 14 megapixels common even in baseline point-and-shoots. Cheap DSLRs from Canon are now scratching 18MP as standard. Megapixels were an easy-to-swallow specification to pitch in marketing, and became the way normal people assessed camera quality. The now-common geek contrarianism is that more megapixels ain't more better. The new go-to standard for folks who consider themselves savvy is low-light performance. Arguably, this revamped arms race was kickstarted by the D3, Nikon's flagship DSLR that forsook megapixels for ISO. (Rumor had it that the D3 and D300 led Canon to shitcan their original, middling update to the 5D, pushing full-steam-ahead for a year to bring us the incredible 5D Mark II.) However it began, "amazing low-light performance" is now a standard bullet point for any camera that costs more than $300 (even if it's not true). Nikon and Canon's latest DSLRs have ISO speeds of over 100,000. Welcome to the new image war. How a Camera Sees The name of the game, as you've probably gathered by now, is collecting light. And in fact, the way a digital camera "sees" actually isn't all that different from the way our eyeballs do, at one level. Light, which is made up of photons, enters through a lens, and hits the image sensor (that boring looking rectangle above) which converts it into an electrical signal, sorta like it enters through an eye's lens and strikes the retina, where it's also converted into an electrical signal. If nothing else after this makes sense, keep this in mind: The more light an image sensor can collect, the better. When a camera is spec'd at 10 megapixels, it's not just telling you that its biggest photos will contain about 10 million pixels. Generally, it's also telling you the number of photosites, or photodiodes on the image sensor; confusingly, these are also often referred to as pixels. Photodiodes are the part of the sensor that's actually sensitive to light, and if you remember your science, a photodiode converts light (photons) into electricity (electrons). The standard trope for explaining photosites is that they're tiny buckets left out in a downpour of photons, collecting the light particles as they rain down. As you might expect, the bigger the photosite, the more photons it can collect at the moment when it's exposed (i.e., when you press the shutter button). Image sensors come in a range of sizes, as you can see in this helpful diagram from Wikipedia. A bigger sensor, like the full-frame slab used in the Canon 5D or Nikon D3, has more space for photosites than the thumbnail-sized sensor that fits in little point-and-shoots. So, if they're both 12-megapixels, that is, they both have 12 million photosites, the bigger sensor can obviously collect a lot more light per pixel, since the pixels are bigger. If you're grasping for a specification to look for, the distance between photosites is referred to as pixel pitch, which roughly tells you how big the photosite, or pixel, is. For instance, a Nikon D3 with a 36mm x 23.9mm sensor has a pixel pitch of 8.45 microns, while a Canon S90 point-and-shoot with a 7.60 mm x 5.70 mm sensor has a pitch of 2 microns. To put that in less math-y terms, if you got the same amount of light to hit the image sensors the D3 and the S90—you know, you took the exact same exposure—the bigger pixels in the D3 would be able to collect and hold on to more of the light. When you're looking for low-light performance, it's immediately obvious why that's a good thing.

Catch More Light, Faster, Faster Okay, so that's easy enough: As an axiom, larger photodiodes result in more light sensitivity. (So with the 1D Mark IV, Canon kept the same photodiode size, but the shrunk the rest of the pixel to fit more of them on the same-size chip as its predecessor). There's more to an image sensor than simply photosites, though, which is why I called up Dr. Peter B. Catrysse from the Department of Electrical Engineering at Stanford University. The "ideal pixel," he says, is flat—just an area that collects light—nearly bare silicon. But even at a basic level, a photodiode sits below layers of other stuff: a micro lens (which directs light onto the photodiode), a color filter (necessary, 'cause image sensors are in fact color blind) and then a layer of gunk, like wiring. So one way manufacturers are improving sensors is by trying to make all of that as thin as possible—we're talking hundreds of nanometers—so more light gets through. One major way that's happening, he says, is with back-illuminated sensors, which move the wiring to the back-side of the silicon substrate, as illustrated in this diagram by Sony. It's currently still more expensive to make sensors this way, but since more light's getting through, you can use smaller pixels (and have more of them). In your basic image sensor construction, there's an array of microlenses sitting above the photosites to direct light into them. Previously, you had gaps between the microlenses, which meant you had light falling through that wasn't being directed onto the actually light-sensitive parts of the sensor. Canon and Nikon have created gapless microlenses, so more of the light falling onto the sensor is directed into the diode, and not wasted. If you must persist with the bucket metaphor, think of it as putting a larger funnel over the bucket, one that can grab more because it has a wider mouth. Here's a shot of gapless microlens architecture: A chief reason to gather as much light as possible is to bring up your signal-to-noise ratio, which is the province of true digital imaging nerds. Anyways, there are several different sources and kinds of noise. Worth knowing is "photon shot" or just "shot" noise, which occurs because the stream of photons hitting the image sensor aren't perfectly consistent in their timing; there's "read" noise, which is inherent to image sensors; and "dark current" noise, which is basically stray electrons striking the sensor that aren't generated by visible light—they're often caused by heat. Taken with a Nikon D3s at ISO 102,400 Back in the day, when people shot photographs on this stuff called film, they actually bought it according to its light sensitivity, expressed as an ISO speed. (A standard set by the International Organization for Standardization, confusingly aka ISO. The film speed standard is ISO 5800:1987.) With digital cameras, you also can tell your camera how sensitive to light it should be using ISO, which is supposed to be equivalent to the film standard. The thing is, whether you're shooting at ISO 100 or ISO 1600, the same number of photons hit your sensor—you're just boosting the signal from the sensor, and along with it, all the noise that was picked up on the way. If you've got more signal to work with—like in a camera whose sensor has some fat photon-collecting pixels, you get a higher signal-to-noise ratio when you crank it up, which is one reason a photo taken D3 at ISO 6400 looks way better than one from a teeny point-and-shoot, and why a 1D Mark IV or D3s can even think about shooting at an ISO of over 100,000, like the photo above. (Another reason is that a 1D Mark IV-level camera possesses vastly superior image processing, with faster processors that can crunch complex algorithms to help reduce noise.) Sensor Shake and Bake There are two kinds of image sensors that most digital cameras use today: CCD (charged-couple device) sensors and CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) sensors, which are actually a kind of active-pixel sensor, but the way they're made have become a shorthand name. "Fundamentally, at least physics-wise, they work exactly the same," says Dr. Catrysse, so one's not intrinsically more awesome than the other. CCD sensors are the more mature imaging tech, so for a long time, they tended to be better, but now CMOS sensors are taking over, having almost completely crowded them out of cellphones and high-end DSLRs (Leica's M9 is an exception)—and Dr. Catrysse suspects the last place for CCD sensors is going to be in niche scientific applications. A "CMOS sensor" is one that's made using the CMOS process, the way you make all kinds of integrated circuits—you know, stuff like CPUs, GPUs and RAM—so they're actually cheaper to make than CCD sensors. (The cheap-to-make aspect is why they've been the sensor of choice in cameraphones, and conversely, DSLRs with huge chips.) And, unlike a CCD sensor, which has to move all of the electrons off of the chip to run them through an analog-to-digital converter, with a CMOS sensor, all of that happens on the same integrated chip. So they're faster, and they use less power. Something to think about as well: Because they're made pretty much the same way as any other semiconductor, CMOS sensors progress along with advances in semiconductor manufacturing. Smaller transistors allow for more circuits in a pixel and the potential to remove more noise at the source, says Dr. Catrysse, bringing us closer to fundamental physical limits, like photon noise. And then we're talking about controlling light at the nanoscale. The Point We've reached, in many ways, a point of megapixel fatigue: They're not as valuable, or even as buzzy as they used to be. Not many of us print billboard-sized images. But the technology continues to progress—more refined sensors, smarter image processors, sharper glass—and the camera industry needs something to sell us every year. But that's not entirely a bad thing. Our friend and badass war photographer Teru Kuwayama says that while "increasing megapixel counts are mostly just a pain in the ass, unless you happen to be in the hard drive or memory card business, skyrocketing ISOs on the other hand, are a quantum leap, opening up a time-space dimension that didn't exist for previous generations of photographers. I'd happily trade half the megapixels for twice the light sensitivity." Better images, not just bigger images. That's the promise of this massive shift. The clouds to this silver lining are that by next year, ISO speeds will likely be the headline, easy-to-digest spec for consumers. And like any other spec, just because the ISO ratings go higher doesn't mean low-light performance will be better. Remember, "more" isn't more better. Still something you wanna know? Send questions about ISO, isometric exercise or isolation here with "Giz Explains" in the subject line.

]]>
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:00:00 -0500 http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/m_FCHTFG9Q0/giz-explains-why-iso-is-the-new-megapixel
The Fatal Flaw With Google Buzz's Edit Button [Comics] http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/288 Fixing a typo is handy, sure, but something tells me that the less morally scrupulous among us will have a field day with Google Buzz's edit button—namely, this comic. [DogHouseDiaries via reddit]

]]>
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:20:00 -0500 http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/SOZLBefbWuI/the-fatal-flaw-with-google-buzzs-edit-button
Cut Costs Without Cutting Meaning http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/284 In reaction to the Great Recession and the forecasts that consumer demand in the US, Europe, and Japan will remain anemic for the foreseeable future, many companies are focusing on stripped-down "value" products. In doing so, they risk making a big mistake: Assuming that consumers in hard times care more about utility and low price and less about the emotional and social dimensions of products.

While people, of course, do care about price, they care even more about how products give meaning to their lives. Even when they are pressed financially, they do not want to feel poor. So the challenge for companies is to cut costs without cutting meaning.

One of the most successful products to do this was the Panda, a three-door hatchback city car that Fiat created in response to the oil shocks of the 1970s and the economic downturn that followed. The Panda was conceived as a "no frills, big thrills" rugged car. Its backseat was a cloth rectangle stretched between two tubes that could be folded to hold a baby or fragile parcels, unfolded flat to make a bed-sized mattress, or removed, rolled up, and stored in a slot carved out of the floor behind the front seats to create a cargo bay.

The Panda's design not only allowed it to be assembled rapidly and inexpensively but also gave it a distinctive personality: According to Fiat's market analyses, only 38% of customers considered price a significant reason for buying a Panda. Most wanted a rugged, all-terrain, lighthearted car; being cheap was just an essential part of its "no frills, big thrills" concept.

Its meaning and identity allowed the Panda to remain popular long after the economy recovered. While competing cars lasted an average of 8.5 years, the Panda endured for 23. During that time, Fiat made only minor changes to the model and sold 4.5 million worldwide, with only minor changes. It was one of the most profitable cars ever produced.

Some other companies are masters at creating products that are good-enough value price-wise, but don't daily remind their owners that they couldn't afford to buy more expensive alternatives. For example, people love to buy IKEA furniture because of its modern, clever design, and Swatch watches because they can be used as fashion accessories. They use Skype not only because it provides a a free alternative to traditional phone calls but also because its multimedia tools, which include video calls, chats, and file sharing, allow them to stay intimately connected with friends in faraway places.

In these hard times, remember that people still love meaningful things. Do not just design to cost. Design to mean.

Roberto Verganti is the author of Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating what Things Mean. Professor of the management of innovation at Politecnico di Milano and a member of the board of the European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, he has served as an executive advisor, coach, and educator at a variety of firms, including Ferrari, Ducati, Whirlpool, Xerox, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, Barilla, Nestlè, STMicroelectronics, and Intuit.

]]>
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:02:00 -0500 http://feeds.harvardbusiness.org/~r/harvardbusiness/~3/EWI5kBbnULs/cut_cost_not_meaning.html
Chrysler: Fiat 500 On Sale In U.S. By End Of Year [New Cars] http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/285 The Fiat 500 will go on sale in the U.S. by the end of the year, according to Dodge Car Brand CEO Ralph Giles in a speech to the Economic Club of Chicago a few minutes ago.This is despite conventional wisdom saying federalizing the car for the U.S. would take them until at least early 2011, if not later. He also said the Grand Cherokee will be on sale within three months. Given how desperate Chrysler is for new products before they run short on funding and FIAT runs short on patience, it could be a great step forward for the automaker... if it's true.

]]>
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:21:00 -0500 http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/jalopnik/full/~3/7zRx-r-fHgc/chrysler-fiat-500-on-sale-in-us-by-end-of-year
Republicans -- Not Obama -- More Often on Wrong Side of Public Opinion http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/282 One of the more commonplace assertions among pundits on the center-right -- made rather carelessly by Victor Davis Hanson and more thoughtfully by Jay Cost, is that agenda put forward by Obama and the Democrats is overwhelmingly unpopular and that Democrats are simply getting their comeuppance for having pushed such a liberal set of reforms forward. These claims, however, rely on selective evidence, invariably citing policies like health care and the GM bailouts which are indeed unpopular (strongly so, in some cases), while ignoring many other issues on which Obama has been on the right side of public opinion.In fact, a more objective and equivocal evaluation of public opinion on more than two dozen specific issues finds that the Republican Congress has far more often been on the wrong side of it. Attempting to be as comprehensive as possible, I've identified 25 issues that Obama and the Democrats have made an affirmative effort to push forward since taking office a year ago, and summarized public opinion on each of them. Most of the numbers that I've cited come from PollingReport.com.Afghanistan Troop Escalation. An average of seven polls taken since President Obama's speech on Afghanistan in December show a 54-41 majority of the public in favor of escalating troop commitments. However, Obama appeared to get a bump from his speech, as an average of four polls conducted in November, prior to the speech, had shown a 49-46 plurality opposed to greater troop commitments.Bank Tax. An NPR poll found a 57-39 majority in favor of the bank tax proposal, which the Congress has yet to consider, after being read arguments both for and against the program. (An ABC/Post poll found a 73-26 majority in favor of taxing financial sector bonuses over $1 million dollars, although the White House has not advocated for that measure.)Ben Bernanke. The only poll on Ben Bernanke, from NBC/WSJ, found a 37-34 plurality opposed to his reappointment; Bernanke was approved by 22 of 40 Senate Republicans and 48 of 60 Senate Democrats.Bush Tax Cuts. Although this polling is somewhat out of date, a CBS/NYT poll in April found 74 percent in favor, and 23 percent opposed, to raising taxes on those making more than $250,000 per year, as Obama's budget would do. A Newsweek poll in March, with somewhat different phrasing, found 49 percent in favor of letting the tax cuts on the wealthy expire and 42 percent opposed.Campaign Finance. The only poll to have asked directly about the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision is from FOX News, which found voters disapproving of the decision 53-27. A Gallup poll conducted last month found that, while most Americans consider campaign finance to be a form of free speech, they nevertheless by a 52-41 margin felt that the ability to place limits on political contributions was the higher priority.Cap-and-Trade. The last five organizations to release polls on cap-and-trade (AP/Stanford, ABC/Post, CNN, Pew, Rasmussen) actually show it favored by the public by a 51-40 margin, on average. It is likely that a significant fraction of the public does not understand what cap-and-trade is; nevertheless most of these polls provided descriptions of the bill's contents. Eight House Republicans voted for the climate bill in June; the Senate has yet to consider the measure.Cash-for-Clunkers. The only organization to poll on this was Rasmussen, which found voters opposed to the program 35-54 in June, but a 44-38 plurality favoring the program in retrospect after it had been implemented.Credit Card Protections. 77 percent of respondents favored the Credit Card Protection Act, according to a poll by Open Congress. The bill was approved 90-5 by the Senate in May, as well as by a 105-69 majority of House Republicans.D.C. Voting Rights. 58 percent of the public favored, and 35 percent opposed, giving an a House seat to D.C. in a nationwide Washington Post poll conducted last February. The Senate approved D.C. voting rights by a 61-37 margin last February, with 6 Republicans voting in favor and 2 Democrats voting against, although the measure subsequently died in the House.Fair Pay. Congress approved the Liddy Ledbetter Fair Pay Act last January; it received the support of 3 Republicans in the House and 5 in the Senate. A Rasmussen poll conducted shortly after the legislation passed found that Americans by a 66-24 majority do not believe that women earn equal pay for equal work, although it did not ask about the legislation specifically.Financial Regulation. A Time/SRBI poll in October found that 59 percent of the public favors more regulation of Wall Street versus 13 percent favoring less and 22 percent the same amount. A CNN poll two weeks ago found 62 percent in favor of greater regulations and 35 percent opposed. House Republicans opposed the financial regulation bill unanimously.Gays in the Military. Four organizations -- FOX, Gallup, Quinnipiac, and CNN -- have released polls on Don't Ask Don't Tell since Obama's inauguration. They show an average of 58 percent saying that Don't Ask Don't Tell should be repealed and that gays and lesbians should be allowed to serve openly in the military, and 35 percent opposed. No votes have yet occurred on DADT in either the House or the Senate, although the House's repeal legislation has just one Republican co-sponsor.GM/Chrysler Bailout. Quite unpopular: an NBC/WSJ poll in early June showed 39 percent of the public in favor and 52 percent opposed to the bailout, and a CNN poll in April found that 22 percent of the public favored additional assistance to GM and Chrysler while 76 percent would have preferred to let them go bankrupt. (There was no specific vote on GM in this Congress; instead, its funds came by way of the TARP program.)Guantanamo Bay. Four organizations to release polls on Gutantanamo Bay between last February and last June found an average 55 percent of Americans opposed to closing the detention facility and 39 percent in favor, with the number of those opposed tending to increase over time.Hate Crimes. Although there have been no recent polls on the subject, a Gallup survey in May 2007 found a 68-27 majority in favor of expanding hate crimes statues to include sexual and gender identity. The Matthew Shepard act, a hate crimes measure, passed the Congress last year, receiving the support of 18 House Republicans and 5 Senate Republicans.Health Care. It has clearly become unpopular; the latest Pollster.com trendlines show 38 percent in favor of the bill and 55 percent opposed. One Republican voted for the health care bill in the House and none did in the Senate.Jobs Bill. A CNN poll in December found 74 percent thought Obama should concentrate on creating more jobs "even if it means less deficit reduction." A Bloomberg/Selzer poll, also in December, asked about specific measures that might be undertaken as part of a jobs bill and found 68 percent in favor (and 28 percent opposed) to tax credits, and 66 percent in favor (versus 32 percent opposed) of spending on public works projects, although just 48 percent were in favor of additional assistance to state and local governments. House Republicans unanimously opposed a $100 billion jobs bill in December.Mortgage Relief. Senate Republican unanimously voted against the Durbin Amendment to provide mortgage relief in April, as did 12 Senate Democrats. However, four organizations which polled on mortgage relief in February through April found an average of 60 percent of Americans in support of additional assistance versus 34 percent opposed.PAYGO. There is no specific polling on Congressional pay-go rules, which Senate Republicans recently voted against 40-0., but in the abstract moves toward balancing the budget are almost always popular, such as a CNN poll in November which found 67 percent preferring balanced budgets to deficits "even when the country is in a recession and is at war."SCHIP. Although there have been no recent polls on SCHIP (children's health care), an ABC/Post poll in September, 2007 found it supported 72-25 by the public, and a CNN poll in October, 2007 found that the public wanted by a 61-35 margin for the Congress to override President Bush's veto of the program. Nine Republican Senators voted to extend SCHIP in February as did 40 House Republicans.Sonia Sotomayor. The last five polls to be released on Sonia Sotmayor in advance of her confirmation showed 52 percent in favor of her confirmation and 30 percent opposed, on average. Senate Republicans opposed her confirmation 31-9.Stimulus. The stimulus has become somewhat unpopular now -- although most individual elements of the program remain popular. However, the stimulus was somewhat popular at the time of its passage. An average of the last five organizations to release polls in advance of the Senate's vote on the stimulus on 2/9/09 showed 50 percent in favor of the bill and 38 percent opposed. House Republicans opposed the stimulus unanimously; Senate Republicans gave it 3 votes.TARP. The TARP program began under Bush and was extended before Obama took office, but Obama nevertheless actively lobbied Democrats for its extension. TARP was unpopular from the get-go, and Americans opposed its extension 56-32 last January, according to a poll then from Diageo/Hotline. All but 6 Senate Republicans voted not to extend TARP.Terrorist Trials. An average of two recent polls from Rasmussen and CBS had 38 percent of the public in favor of terror trials in civilian courts, but 55 percent opposed.Torture Memos and Investigations. Four polls conducted in April showed an average of 43 percent of Americans in favor and 51 percent opposed into an investigation of Bush-era torture policies. The only poll to ask about the release of the Bush torture memos, from ABC/Post, found 53 percent in favor and 44 percent opposed.-Of these 25 issues, Obama's position appears to be on the right side of public opinion on 14: the bank tax, repealing the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, campaign finance, the credit card bill, D.C. voting rights, fair pay, financial regulation, gays in the military, hate crimes, the jobs bill, mortgage relief, PAYGO, SCHIP, and Sotomayor. It would appear to be on the wrong side of public opinion on five issues: the GM/Chrysler bailout, Guantanamo Bay, health care, the extension of the TARP program, and terrorist trials. On the other six issues, the polling is probably too ambiguous to render a clear verdict.Republicans, on the other hand, have been overwhelmingly opposed to almost all of these measures with the exception of Ben Bernanke and Afghanistan troops, both of which poll ambiguously, and the credit card bill, which polled well.Obviously, this analysis is superficial in certain ways. All issues are by no means created equal, and health care in particular, which is unpopular, has weighed heavily upon the public's perception of the Democrats. In addition, there is probably another layer of 'meta-argument' that goes beyond specific issues, and at which the GOP has tended to excel.Nevertheless, it runs in contrast to the objective evidence when one asserts, as Hanson does, that "On every issue ... the Obama position polls 5-15 points below 50 percent." Rather, the votes taken by the Republican Congress have far more often been out of step with those of the median voter.This is not to give a mulligan to the White House or to the Democrats -- as I've written before, their meta-strategy has necessarily had to be somewhat terrible so as to take what has been a fairly popular and centrist agenda and have it regarded as overwhelmingly contentious and partisan by so much of the public.EDIT: What about EFCA/card check? I didn't forget about it; rather, I excluded it because it's something which the Democrats abandoned early on and which the White House never lifted a finger for. Obviously, there are a lot of policies that the Democrats theoretically have in their arsenal -- card check, legalizing pot, gay marriage, nationalizing the banks, a radically more progressive tax code, etc. -- which are both quite liberal and (with one or two possible exceptions) quite unpopular. But the Congressional Democrats didn't spend much of any effort on those issues, and the White House spent essentially none. The agenda they've spent their political capital on, rather, has been quite centrist -- which is sort of the whole point of this article.If you did include card check, by the way, the verdict would be rather ambiguous. Ignoring some amazingly crappy (and contradictory) partisan polling on both sides of the topic, the closest we have to a neutral poll is this one from Gallup, which shows 53 percent in favor of a "new law that would make it easier for labor unions to organize workers" but which is probably too vague to be useful. To be clear, my hunch is that card check would indeed prove to become unpopular if it were debated more vigorously -- but that's just a hunch, and we're trying to rely on the objective evidence for this exercise.

]]>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:23:00 -0500 http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/02/republicans-not-obama-more-often-on.html
Historical WWII imagery now available in Google Earth http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/283 When reconnaissance pilots brought back precious surveillance photos during World War II (WWII) they could not have imagined that they would one day be comparable with the cityscape seen from satellite 50 years into the future, and available around the world at the touch of a button. Google has made this possible with new functionality for Google Earth - historical WWII imagery - giving people a unique opportunity to see the effect of past events using today's mapping technology. .. Tags: Clock, Google, Historic, Mapping, Reconnaissance, Satellite

Related Articles:

Google Earth goes to Mars Google Earth moves to become Google Universe Google street view: 360 degree views from any point on the map. Google Earth presents artworks from the Museo del Prado in ultra-high resolution Satellite imagery used for sales lead generation Solar GPS unit tracks your travel experience

]]>
Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:32:00 -0500 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GizmagEmergingTechnologyMagazine/~3/g84VLdvCJBA/
California Air Resources Board Launches $20M in Funding Assistance for Heavy-Duty Hybrid Trucks and Buses http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/281 The California Air Resources Board launched a $20 million funding assistance program designed to spur the purchase of hybrid trucks and buses that reduce smog-forming pollution and address climate change.

Funding incentives range from $10,000 to $45,000 and each vehicle purchaser, regardless of the size of their fleet, is limited to a maximum of 100 vouchers. The program, which cuts about half the cost of purchasing road-ready hybrid trucks and buses, is expected to put up to 800 vehicles on the road on a first-come, first-served basis. ARB created the financial incentive program from AB 118 funding to help Californians purchase cleaner, but more costly hybrid vehicles.

Hybrid vehicle technology can reduce truck and bus emissions by 20 to 50 percent, including gases that contribute to global warming. Hybrid vehicles also reduce smog-forming emissions while saving vehicle owners money in reduced fuel costs.

ARB has partnered with CALSTART to administer the program. Eligibility is based on the purchase of selected hybrid vehicles and fleet owners must agree to register and operate the vehicle in California for three years. Dealers, manufactures and fleet owners can learn more about the program at californiahvip.org.

The program will also help achieve the goals of the state’s Climate Change Scoping Plan that requires California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 with clean alternative fuels. Transportation accounts for 40% of the total emissions of climate changing gases.

Smog has been known to exacerbate a variety of cardiovascular and respiratory conditions such as heart disease and asthma, and diesel particulate matter was listed as toxic in 1998. Diesel particulate matter contains a variety of harmful gases and over 40 other known cancer-causing substances, linking it to premature death, cancer and other health problems.

]]>
Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:56:00 -0500 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/greencarcongress/TrBK/~3/8c71uI09xIg/arb-20100204.html
Sea Kayaking this the Last week of January http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/271 Check out the Map of this weeks paddling http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&msa=0&ll=33.641205,-117.972565&spn=0.0746,0.154324&t=h&z=13&msid=111491003764097604287.00047e69890a985a96f78

]]>
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:30:00 -0500 http://go.kayaking.com/xn/detail/2178934:BlogPost:26767
China Leading Race to Make Clean Energy http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/268 Shifting to sustainable energy could leave the West dependent on technology from China, much as the developed world now depends on oil from the Mideast.

]]>
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:00:00 -0500 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/energy-environment/31renew.html
Wind Power O&M Is Key to Profitability http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/266 Wind is, as an opening speaker at the American Wind Energy Association's "Wind Project Profitability and Reliability" workshop said, changing the world. To take on this urgent responsibility, the industry must achieve ever-better levels of performance. There is no better measure of a wind project's performance than it's profitability. To build and operate a profitable wind plant, developers need to know all the factors that make a project more reliable and how to implement them.

]]>
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0500 http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/01/wind-powers-offer-profitability-reliability-and-jobs?cmpid=rss
Google Reader now lets you track changes on sites without feeds http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/267 Google Reader, considered by many to be the ultimate tool for keeping up with many blog and news feeds at once, has just made it possible to keep track of changes on web sites without subscribable RSS feeds. To do this, users can create “custom feeds” that include any kind of updates. Launched today, this capability should come in handy especially for e-commerce sites that may be adding new products or holding sales; company sites that publish press releases and new developments; and gaming sites showcasing new offerings. The potential is pretty unlimited. To create a custom feed, all you have to do is paste the URL in question into Reader’s existing “Add a Subscription” text field. When you click on “Create a Feed,” you are instructing Reader to check in on the site and suss out the differences between the current product and when you last checked. It provides a listing of these changes as snippets in Reader’s usual format. Here’s an example:

Because you are technically creating a feed where none existed before, you can use Google Reader to give you what you need to follow feedless pages using Bloglines, NewsGator or any other feed reader of your choice. The customized RSS is that clean. Google Reader isn’t the first tool to monitor web site updates — ChangeDetection.com got their first, but it obviously doesn’t have the brand recognition. Responding to previous efforts, web sites have started to alter their code so that people still can’t subscribe. Google also allows these sites to opt out of this new system. It will be interesting to see which web properties choose this option and why.

]]>
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:32:00 -0500 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Venturebeat/~3/AjaJVwgjDzI/
Ecuador - The whole shebang http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/265 Some of this has been copy/pasted from emails I sent, so if tenses shift midway, please excuse.

I decided to take a Trip on Tuesday Jan 5th. On Sat, the 9th I left for Ecuador.

After some flight delays, I got into Quito at about 11 pm Sat. Night. I was pretty beat, and though my hotel was located near a noisy disco, I fell right asleep. 8am found me at the hotel lobby, meeting my group. 2 guides, and 6 paddlers. 3 guys, 3 girls. Ages 30-46. Everyone married, but not traveling with their spouses (except for our Guides, the Fantastic and Super Phil and Mary DeReimer of AdventureKayaking.com. Super nice, friendly crew.

Sunday was a 1/2 travel day, we drove over a nearly14,000 foot pass to the Town of Borja, where we have a very nice lodge. We outfitted boats, and went for a short class III paddle on the Quijos , followed by dinner. Monday was awesome. We woke up, had yummy breakfast, and went for a long paddle. Fun, class IV paddling, very continuos, but nothing super hard. About 5.5 hours on the river. We paddled on the Cosanga, to the confluence with the Quijos, and then paddled the Quijos. Saw an Andean Cock-in-the-Rock and many, many other birds. VERY, VERY, VERY cool. Early on Day 3 we left Borja and went to Tena, about an hours drive away. We stopped on the way to do a really pretty river, though the water was a bit low. This was the Rio Misahualli. It was fun, and I think would be super classic with more water. After paddling, we headed to Tena, which seems to be a bit of a rough place. Not dangerous, just very impoverished, gritty and run down. Our hotel is nice, and the area is gorgeous, but not much else interesting about Tena. If you weren´t paddling, I can´t imagine wanting to spend much time here. There is an incredible steak restaurant. The steak place has several pet sloths, which was cool. And the rivers nearby are fantastic. Simply incredible. So good. Day 4- We seem to be in a bit of a dry spell, so many of the rivers are a little low. Today, we did two laps on the upper stretch of a river, the Piatua, and it was awesome. Not very high volume water, but steep, fun and fast. the river channelized nicely, meaning the low water wasn´t an issue. I bet the run is stomping hard with high flows. The first time through, we took our time, looking at a few spots, talking about the moves, etc. Second time through, we just blasted. First lap took 2.5 hrs, second was 50 minutes. SOOO much fun. The group (6 paddlers, 2 guides) has melded really well, I feel like I´ve been boating with them for years. Every one looks out for each other, and all seem to be strong paddlers of similar skill. I don´t think anyone is bored with the paddling, and no one seems in over their head. Such a cool, perfect trip. If we had a little more water it would be just a bit better, but it´s still awesome. Another dinner at the steakhouse. So good. all 8 people had huge, delicious steaks, some drinks, etc, and the tab for the table was well under $100. Maybe some of the best steak I´ve ever had.

It´s hot as heck in Tena. I wish I´d brought some more clean shirts. I might have to send a few out for laundry, if I´m not paddling, and not in A/C, I´ve just got sweat pouring down my body. Running out of non-stinky shirts. Tough to stay hydrated too, but I´m doing it, pretty much always drinking something. The sun is brutal, we´re almost on the Equator, so I´ve been using the sunscreen 2-4 times a day. So far, no red. Day 5

We paddled the Lower Jondachi today. Easier than some of the other stuff we did, but probably the prettiest run we did. Some really fun rapids too. Steep canyon walls, wild orchids, and the several Blue Morpho butterflies, huge blue butterflies the size of a large saucer. The put in was interesting. My truck arrived last, and there was a group of German boaters who had arrived even before our first truck. The put in was crowded with locals, who appeared eager to earn a few dollars carrying boats to the put in. I felt a bit weird having tiny Ecuadorean women carry my boat for me, normally I’m offering to carry for others! But not long into the steep, muddy, hot, humid hike, I wasn’t going to complain.

Day 6+7 Day 6 and 7 we were back on the Quijos, running a longer section than we’d run on Day 1, that included a few bigger, more technical rapids. Our group had truly melded by then, and it really just felt like paddling with my freinds. Jokes flew, people watched out for each other, and it was grand. Really, truly awesome. On Day 7, Sat, we headed back over the pass to Quito. We had a big steak dinner that night to say goodbyes, and all too soon, 1/2 our group was heading home. Phil and Mary would be picking up a new group in the morning. Ann and Merida had invited me to join them Mtn Biking on Cotopaxi, so it wasn’t quite time for our goodbyes.

Day 8

Another early start to the day, but this time, no paddling gear. I was joining Anne and Merida to bike Cotopaxi. Anne described it in an email as follows: ap made it home in one piece after geoff, merida and i nearly perished from hypothermia at 15,000 feet and all developed an unusual case of sudden-onset black lung on our mountain biking adventure. we took a tour that involved getting taken up cotopaxi in a 4WD vehicle and dropped off to coast on “mountain bikes” downhill. at the top, the wind was blowing at about 40-50mph (you do the metric conversion) and the temp was freezing. and did i mention the sleet? we were all laughing pretty hard about it and geoff had the quote of the day when he approached merida and me and said, “i hate you both!” it warmed up as we descended and that is when the dust cloud hit! we coughed our way back to quito. overall, a comical adventure. i am also certain that we did not have the ace guide of the biking dutchman roster!

i had such a great time hanging out on and off the water with y’all. if you are ever in boise, you are always welcome to stay at our place! yours, as always, in the third person, ap

I’ll admit that I think I might have enjoyed it a lot more than this makes it sound. Though it is very accurate, there was long stretch in the middle of biking the high grasslands on the volcano that I enjoyed a lot. Really pretty. That night, Merida and Anne were both feeling a bit under the weather, so I grabbed some dinner and was in bed early again. Day 9 I rose early, and headed to Old Town Quito. I visited some churches, which were amazing, and stumbled upon some sort of government ceremony or rally, which was interesting. I joined in some “Viva Ecuador!” chants, but couldn’t sing along with the national anthem. I got my haircut, and I must say, it was the finest $1 haircut I’ve ever had! Lunch was $2 at a little local place, and I enjoyed my day, although I’ll admit that after a week of traveling with new friends, it felt a little lonely. In late afternoon I was pretty well finished with spanish churches and colonial architechture, so I headed back to the Mariscal and walked the lenght of the main drags there, did some internetting, and picked up my laundry. Fresh shirts felt awesome at this point.

Day 10 Up early, early, and on the bus to Mindo. Spent some time chatting with an older English couple, who had been all over. Quite the goal to strive for. Mindo is muy tranquillo, a sleepy town in the cloud forest known for it’s amazing biodiversity. I took a long walk, found a place to stay for $10 a night, and sat on the porch. In minutes I’d seen 4-5 butterfly species, and 5-6 hummingbirds. And dozens of other birds. Amazing. I took an even longer walk after settling in, and got caught in a massive rainstorm, but it was so warm I didn’t care. I stopped at a cool butterfly farm, and enjoyed getting photos. A nice, relaxed day, and I could see spending more time in Mindo. Day 11 My last day, and I’d wrestled with staying in Mindo or going to Otovallo, known for it’s markets. I decided to shop, and it was a series of long bus rides that got mt Otovallo by 11 am. I wandered the market town, bought some gifts, and headed back to Quito for early evening. I treated myself to a nice dinner, and it was off to bed.

Day 12 I flew home. Excited to see Kim, but sad to leave Ecuador. There is something about Latin America that just sits right with me. Something about the people, or the pace, or the food, but I just love it. (spider bites and injuries excepted).

I really want to see Asia and Africa, but I’ll admit that when my mind wanders to travel, it’s hard to keep it off Central and South America.

]]>
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:38:00 -0500 http://go.kayaking.com/xn/detail/2178934:BlogPost:26556
Ecuador http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/264 Some of this has been copy/pasted from emails I sent, so if tenses shift midway, please excuse.

I decided to take a Trip on Tuesday Jan 5th.  On Sat, the 9th I left for Ecuador. After some flight delays, I got into Quito at about 11 pm Sat. Night. I was pretty beat, and though my hotel was located near a noisy disco, I fell right asleep. 8am found me at the hotel lobby, meeting my group. 2 guides, and 6 paddlers. 3 guys, 3 girls. Ages 30-46. Everyone married, but not traveling with their spouses (except for our Guides, the Fantastic and Super Phil and Mary DeReimer of  <a href=”http://adventurekayaking.com”>adventurekayaking.com</a> ). Super nice, friendly crew. Sunday was a 1/2 travel day, we drove over a nearly14,000 foot pass to the Town of Borja, where we have a very nice lodge. We outfitted boats, and went for a short class III paddle on the Quijos , followed by dinner. Monday was awesome. We woke up, had yummy breakfast, and went for a long paddle. Fun, class IV paddling, very continuos, but nothing super hard. About 5.5 hours on the river. We paddled on the Cosanga, to the confluence with the Quijos, and then paddled the Quijos.  Saw an Andean Cock-in-the-Rock and many, many other birds.   VERY, VERY, VERY cool. Early on Day 3 we left Borja and went to Tena, about an hours drive away.  We stopped on the way to do a really pretty river, though the water was a bit low.  This was the Rio Misahualli.    It was fun, and I think would be super classic with more water. After paddling, we headed to Tena, which seems to be a bit of a rough place.  Not dangerous, just very impoverished, gritty and run down.  Our hotel is nice, and the area is gorgeous, but not much else interesting about Tena.  If you weren´t paddling, I can´t imagine wanting to spend much time here.  There is an incredible steak restaurant.  The steak place has several pet sloths, which was cool.    And the rivers nearby are fantastic.  Simply incredible.   So good. Day 4- We seem to be in a bit of a dry spell, so many of the rivers are a little low.  Today, we did two laps on the upper stretch of a river, the Piatua, and it was awesome.  Not very high volume water, but steep, fun and fast. the river channelized nicely, meaning the low water wasn´t an issue.   I bet the run is stomping hard with high flows. The first time through, we took our time, looking at a few spots, talking about the moves, etc.  Second time through, we just blasted.  First lap took 2.5 hrs, second was 50 minutes.  SOOO much fun.   The group (6 paddlers, 2 guides) has melded really well, I feel like I´ve been boating with them for years.   Every one looks out for each other, and all seem to be strong paddlers of similar skill.  I don´t think anyone is bored with the paddling, and no one seems in over their head.  Such a cool, perfect trip.   If we had a little more water it would be just a bit better, but it´s still awesome. Another dinner at the steakhouse.  So good.  all 8 people had huge, delicious steaks, some drinks, etc, and the tab for the table was well under $100.   Maybe some of the best steak I´ve ever had. It´s hot as heck in Tena. I wish I´d brought some more clean shirts.  I might have to send a few out for laundry, if I´m not paddling, and not in A/C, I´ve just got sweat pouring down my body.  Running out of non-stinky shirts.  Tough to stay hydrated too, but I´m doing it, pretty much always drinking something.  The sun is brutal, we´re almost on the Equator, so I´ve been using the sunscreen 2-4 times a day.  So far, no red. Day 5 We paddled the Lower Jondachi today.  Easier than some of the other stuff we did, but probably the prettiest run we did.  Some really fun rapids too.    Steep canyon walls, wild orchids, and the several Blue Morpho butterflies, huge blue butterflies the size of a large saucer. The put in was interesting.   My truck arrived last, and there was a group of German boaters who had arrived even before our first truck.  The put in was crowded with locals, who appeared eager to earn a few dollars carrying boats to the put in.  I felt a bit weird having tiny Ecuadorean women carry my boat for me, normally I’m offering to carry for others!   But not long into the steep, muddy, hot, humid hike, I wasn’t going to complain. Day 6+7

Day 6 and 7 we were back on the Quijos, running a longer section than we’d run on Day 1, that included a few bigger, more technical rapids.   Our group had truly melded by then, and it really just felt like paddling with my freinds.  Jokes flew, people watched out for each other, and it was grand.  Really, truly awesome. On Day 7, Sat, we headed back over the pass to Quito.  We had a big steak dinner that night to say goodbyes, and all too soon, 1/2 our group was heading home.   Phil and Mary would be picking up a new group in the morning.  Ann and Merida had invited me to join them Mtn Biking on Cotopaxi, so it wasn’t quite time for our goodbyes. Day 8 Another early start to the day, but this time, no paddling gear.   I was joining Anne and Merida to bike Cotopaxi.   Anne described it in an email as follows:

ap made it home in one piece after geoff, merida and i nearly perished from hypothermia at 15,000 feet and all developed an unusual case of sudden-onset black lung on our mountain biking adventure.  we took a tour that involved getting taken up cotopaxi in a 4WD vehicle and dropped off to coast on “mountain bikes” downhill.  at the top, the wind was blowing at about 40-50mph (you do the metric conversion) and the temp was freezing.  and did i mention the sleet?  we were all laughing pretty hard about it and geoff had the quote of the day when he approached merida and me and said, “i hate you both!”  it warmed up as we descended and that is when the dust cloud hit!  we coughed our way back to quito.  overall, a comical adventure.  i am also certain that we did not have the ace guide of the biking dutchman roster! i had such a great time hanging out on and off the water with y’all.  if you are ever in boise, you are always welcome to stay at our place! yours, as always, in the third person, ap

I’ll admit that I think I might have enjoyed it a lot more than this makes it sound.   Though it is very accurate, there was long stretch in the middle of biking the high grasslands on the volcano that I enjoyed a lot.   Really pretty.  That night, Merida and Anne were both feeling a bit under the weather, so I grabbed some dinner and was in bed early again. Day 9 I rose early, and headed to Old Town Quito.   I visited some churches, which were amazing, and stumbled upon some sort of government ceremony or rally, which was interesting.  I joined in some “Viva Ecuador!” chants, but couldn’t sing along with the national anthem.  I got my haircut, and I must say, it was the finest $1 haircut I’ve ever had!  Lunch was $2 at a little local place, and I enjoyed my day, although I’ll admit that after a week of traveling with new friends, it felt a little lonely.  In late afternoon I was pretty well finished with spanish churches and colonial architechture, so I headed back to the Mariscal and walked the lenght of the main drags there, did some internetting, and picked up my laundry.  Fresh shirts felt awesome at this point. Day 10 Up early, early, and on the bus to Mindo.  Spent some time chatting with an older English couple, who had been all over.  Quite the goal to strive for.   Mindo is muy tranquillo, a sleepy town in the cloud forest known for it’s amazing biodiversity.  I took a long walk, found a place to stay for $10 a night, and sat on the porch.  In minutes I’d seen 4-5 butterfly species, and 5-6 hummingbirds.  And dozens of other birds.  Amazing. I took an even longer walk after settling in, and got caught in a massive rainstorm, but it was so warm I didn’t care.  I stopped at a cool butterfly farm, and enjoyed getting photos.  A nice, relaxed day, and I could see spending more time in Mindo.

Day 11 My last day, and I’d wrestled with staying in Mindo or going to Otovallo, known for it’s markets.  I decided to shop, and it was a series of long bus rides that got mt Otovallo by 11 am.   I wndered the market town, bought some gifts, and headed back to Quito for early evening. I treated myself to a nice dinner, and it was off to bed.

Day 12 I flew home.  Excited to see Kim, but sad to leave Ecuador.  There is something about Latin America that just sits right with me.  Something about the people, or the pace, or the food, but I just love it.  (spider bites and injuries excepted).

I really want to see Asia and Africa, but I’ll admit that when my mind wanders to travel, it’s hard to keep it off Central and South America.

[Show as slideshow]

 

Related posts:Joshua Tree Climbing and Camping A few months back, my friend from b-school (Alex M.)...

]]>
Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:40:00 -0500 http://kimandgeoff.com/2010/01/ecuador/
Biodiesel companies dying as subsidies end. http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/260 Daily Tech has good article on the biodiesel market and the effect of ending subsidies.  Basically, as the US government ends it’s $1/gallon subsidy on biodiesel it has become uneconomical to produce.   Biodiesel producers, big and small, are shutting down.  There are several ways to look at this: Silly, knee-jerk free market types will say “good riddance, if it’s a good product then it makes sense without subsidies”.   Although I generally agree that markets are generally effective, it is also true that allowing markets to move without regulation or oversight can cause big swings in pricing, allow monopolies, bubbles and crashes.  On the other hand, subsidies, favored by many in the  environmental movement, can have the effect of picking a winner. Let’s suppose someone had a way of synthetically manufacturing net-zero-carbon fuel, that was just slightly more expensive than oil, but burned in regular cars, and was compatible with our current infrastructure.  Seems like a winner, right? Maybe not.  Right now, the Obama administration seems to be investing a ton of money in electric vehicles and battery technology. It’s possible that massive investments could make one idea the winner, even if it weren’t the superior one based on technology or environmental benefits. Depending on subsidies and government programs, and who can afford good lobbyists, ideas that don’t make much sense (corn ethanol?) can receive tons and tons of government assistance. (Corn ethanol.)   Arguing with myself, many ideas are very expensive to develop and commercialize, and without government assistance, a lot of technology we use every day wouldn’t exist.    From small SBIR grants to multi-billion dollar DARPA programs, we have benefited greatly from government involvement. My best guess for a solution?  Incentives that promote a particular result, not a particular technology.  If lower CO2 is the goal, then provide incentives and funding for programs that reduce CO2.

Share this on Reddit

Share this on Facebook

Tweet This!

Share this on del.icio.us

Digg this!

Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon

Share this on Technorati

Share this on Linkedin

Share this on FriendFeed

Related posts:What You Don’t Know About Energy Can Kill You – Warnings about the Oil Companies Is Corn Ethanol dying? With Oil Under $70 Again, What’s It Mean for Green? – thedailygreen.com

]]>
Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:34:00 -0500 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CleanTechDealFlow/~3/OxCf_XFKt6E/biodiesel-companies-dying-as-subsidies-end.html
Venture Capital investments down in 2009 from 2008, though 4th quarter looks better. http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/259 Techcrunch has published an analysis of VC funding in 2009.   4th quarter results look promising, with funding up 78% from the third quarter.   We can hope that this trend will continue into 2010 and signals the return of venture capital investing.  It is interesting to note that evne with the large amounts invested in Q4 09, the 2009 totals were still significantly lower than 2008.  (2009, $32.6B : 2008 $38B).  Their data shows the investing slump really starting in Q3 2008, so hopefully the 5 quarter period is over. I noticed, and a commenter on TechCrunch did the math, that the number of deals is relatively low, with an average investment of $13M.   Sure, there may be some small A rounds in there, but it indicates that a lot of the money is going in later rounds, in big dollar amounts.  Good to support the industry and create jobs, but potentially tougher for true start-ups. The good news for Clean Tech is that several of the bigger deals are clean. Some of the big funding rounds of the quarter included Zynga’s $180 million, Playdom’s $43 million, and RockYou’s $50 million. But clean tech cleaned up even more, with Horizon Wind Energy bringing in $318 million in financing, Silver Spring Networks adding $105 million to its coffers, and Sun Run Generation raising $90 million. All in all, promising signs, but we’ll have to see what the next few quarters bring before making any judgments on the health of the VC community. http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/03/venture-funding-fourth-quarter-2009-15-billion/

Share this on Reddit

Share this on Facebook

Tweet This!

Share this on del.icio.us

Digg this!

Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon

Share this on Technorati

Share this on Linkedin

Share this on FriendFeed

Related posts:Venture capital fund raising drops 71 percent in Q4 VC’s down on current state of the industry. Where are the Hot Spots for venture capital? Tim Draper

]]>
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:05:00 -0500 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CleanTechDealFlow/~3/Dx4l-KUJkq4/venture-capital-investments-down-in-2009-from-2008-though-4th-quarter-looks-better.html
Healthcare Spending and Life Expectancy http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/258 Youall know about this already, but I wanted to post this plot of health-care expenditure and life expectancy (click on the graph to see a larger version):A somewhat misleading (in my opinion) presentation of these numbers has been floating around on the web recently, and so I wanted to post this cleaner graph. (The area of the circle for each country is proportional to the number of doctor visits per person; I don't know that this information is so crucial but I included it, as it was on the original graph that I've modified.)See here for background.

]]>
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:07:00 -0500 http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/healthcare-spending-and-life-expectancy.html
Paddling Huntington Harbor to Long Beach http://g.eoffj.com/items/view/257 Had a nice paddle today with my wife in the Northstar Tandem. We paddled about 15 miles in 3.5 hours, in pretty calm conditions. Very good times.

You can see the route we took on the map (click to see in an interactive google map) , and the pictures below.

Find more photos like this on Kayaking.com

]]>
Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:00:00 -0500 http://go.kayaking.com/xn/detail/2178934:BlogPost:25586